Symphony Bay path surface and erosion concerns

Says the path behind his house sits on roughly a 45% grade and half of it has washed away; questions who is liable if someone falls and invites commissioners to view the site.

Warns the path will fail within a year, claims wetland intrusion within a foot of the boundary, and demands to know whether the path was actually engineered for the stormwater volume it receives.

Uses the path regularly and notes erosion gullies; asks whether the path might eventually be paved with asphalt.

Disagrees with the paving suggestions and the 45% grade claim; supports keeping the path with crushed gravel, saying runoff just needs to be diverted.

Says the packet maps misrepresent how close the path runs to his property line and worries walkers will trespass across his lot during washouts.

Draws on Kishwauquito Nature Conservancy experience; recommends coarse road gravel compacted then topped with finer gravel to hold up against rain.

Walks the path daily; says overgrown brush has squeezed the six-foot path down to about two feet of walkable width.

Says crushed rock beats mulch but argues paving would be the lowest-maintenance long-term answer and would serve Phase 8 residents heading to the clubhouse.

Asks who pays if paving happens and, more pointedly, who's liable — the city or the HOA — if someone falls into the wetland from the steep drop.

The Fairwyn Development rep explains the path history, says Phase 8 work is paused pending the surface decision, and notes a meeting with engineer Kapur to address slope armoring and culverts.